袁傳有所著的《避免二次傷害——警察訊問言語研究》屬於法律語言學研究領域，旨在運用語言學理論和方法分析、解決法律問題。本研究中的“二次傷害”指警察的訊問言語對家庭暴力案件中作為犯罪嫌疑人的受虐女性所造成的言語傷害。基於言語適應理論和語言評價理論，本研究建構了“多維度言語轉變模型”作為研究警察話語的分析框架，從社會、文化和心理維度就警察言語進行話語分析，並得出結論：“二次傷害”問題可以通過警察訊問模式的變革—從訊問到詢問的言語轉變加以避免。

Acknowledgements
List of Figures and Tables
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Rationale of This Study
1.2 Working Definitions
1.3 Research Objective
1.4 Research Questions
1.5 Data and Research Methodology
1.5.1 Data Collection and Data Classification
1.5.2 Research Methods
1.6 Significance of This Study
1.7 Organization of This Book
Chapter 2 Previous Studies of Relevant Topics
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Studies on Domestic Violence
2.2.1 Definitions of Domestic Violence and Violence Against Women
2.2.2 Relevant Laws and Regulations
2.2.3 Research on DV/VAW
2.3 Research on Police Interrogations
2.3.1 Interrogation Tactics and Techniques
2.3.2 Approach of Forensic Psychology
2.3.3 Communication Approach to Policing Domestic Violence
2.3.4 Approach of Forensic Linguistics
2.3.5 Legislative Power of Interrogating Suspects by the Police in China
2.3.6 Approaches to Language Issues of Police Interrogations in China
2.3.7 Related Research on Linguistic Strategies in Courtroom Interaction
2.4 Linguistic Theories Relevant to Speech Shifting
2.4.1 A Survey of the Speech Accommodation Theory
2.4.2 SAT in Use
2.4.3 An Overview of the SFL and Its Appraisal Theory
2.4.4 SFL and Appraisal Theory in Use
2.4.5 The Birmingham School of Discourse Analysis
2.6 Summary
Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Revisiting the Linguistic Theories Along Three Dimensions
3.2.1 Engagement System Realizing Social Variables: Power and Solidarity
3.2.2 Accommodation Adapting to Cultural and Psychological Dimensions
3.2.3 Language Devices Realizing the Linguistic Strategies
3.2.3.1 Lexical Choice and Information Density
3.2.3.2 Grammatical Variation and Pragmatic Transmutation
3.2.3.3 Exchange Structure: Two-Move Versus Three-Move Exchanges
3.2.3.4 Structural Location
3.3 The Analytical Framework
3.3.1 The Notion of Speech Shifting
3.3.2 A Multi-Dimensional Speech Shifting Model
3.4 Summary
Chapter 4 Speech Shifting Along the Social Dimension
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Conventional Speech in Police Interrogations
4.2.1 Power Relation Dominating Police Interrogations
4.2.2 Dialogic Contraction as a Linguistic Strategy to Maintain Power Relation
4.2.3 Micro Strategies and Language Devices to Realize Dialogic Contraction
4.2.3.1 Identifying Intergroup Membership
4.2.3.2 Controlling Exchange/Discourse Structure
4.2.3.3 Delivering Police Warnings
4.2.3.4 Proclaiming the Criminal Policy
4.2.3.5 Making Use of Pragmatic Transmutation
4.2.4 Limitations of the Conventional Interrogation Speech
4.3 Speech Shifting to Police Interviewing
4.3.1 Solidarity Relation Prevailing in Police Interviewing
4.3.2 Dialogic Expansion as a Linguistic Strategy to Build Solidarity Relation
4.3.3 Micro Strategies and Language Devices to Realize Dialogic Expansion
4.3.3.1 Establishing Rapport with Suspects
4.3.3.2 Attenuating Suspect's Criminal Liability
4.3.3.3 Accentuating Victim's Blunder
4.3.3.4 Being Sympathetic and Empathetic to Suspects
4.3.3.5 Delivering Police Cautions
4.3.4 Merits of the Police Interviewing Speech
4.4 Summary
Chapter 5 Speech Shifting Along the Cultural Dimension
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Cultural Dimension Affecting Speech Shifting
5.2.1 Police Culture
5.2.2 The Suspects' Literacy
5.2.3 Culture-Determined Speech Shitling
5.3 Speech Divergence in Police Interrogations
5.3.1 Lexical Divergence
5.3.2 Grammatical Divergence
5.3.2.1 Divergent Statements
5.3.2.2 Divergent Mands
5.3.2.3 Divergent Questions
5.3.3 Discursive Divergence
5.4 Speech Convergence in Police Interviewing
5.4.1 Lexical Convergence
5.4.2 Grammatical Convergence
5.4.2.1 Convergent Statements to Deliver Police Cautions
5.4.2.2 Convergent Mands to Make Requests
5.4.2.3 Convergent Questions to Seek Information
5.4.3 Discursive Convergence
5.4.4 Speech Shifting from Divergence to Convergence
5.5 Summary
Chapter 6 Speech Shifting Along the Psychological Dimension
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Attitude-Related Speech Shifting
6.2.1 Perception-Related Linguistic Strategies
6.2.2 Affect-Related Speech Accommodation
6.2.2.1 Speech Divergence with Negative Affect
6.2.2.2 Speech Convergence with Positive Affect
6.3 Role-Based Speech Shifting
6.3.1 Speech Accommodation Based on Differing Police Roles
6.3.2 Speech Accommodation Based on Perceived Roles of Suspects
6.4 Motivation-Driven Speech Shifting
6.4.1 Speech Divergence Motivated by Eliciting Evidence and Confessions
6.4.2 Speech Convergence Motivated by Seeking Information for Justice
6.5 Gender-Differentiated Speech Shifting
6.5.1 Speech Accommodation on Gender Difference of the Police
6.5.2 Speech Accommodation on Gender Difference of Suspects
6.6 Summary
Chapter 7 Conclusion
7.1 Summary of the Present Study
7.2 Major Findings of the Study
7.2.1 Findings Along the Social Dimension
7.2.2 Findings Along the Cultural Dimension
7.2.3 Findings Along the Psychological Dimension
7.3 Conclusions
7.4 Implications
7.5 Limitations
7.6 Suggestions for Future Research
References
Appendices
Appendix I: Legislative Stipulations on "Interrogation"
Versus "Interviewing"
Appendix Ih Police Cautions