| | | 釣魚島(英文版) | 該商品所屬分類:經濟 -> 經濟學理論 | 【市場價】 | 532-771元 | 【優惠價】 | 333-482元 | 【介質】 | book | 【ISBN】 | 9787508529592 | 【折扣說明】 | 一次購物滿999元台幣免運費+贈品 一次購物滿2000元台幣95折+免運費+贈品 一次購物滿3000元台幣92折+免運費+贈品 一次購物滿4000元台幣88折+免運費+贈品
| 【本期贈品】 | ①優質無紡布環保袋,做工棒!②品牌簽字筆 ③品牌手帕紙巾
| |
版本 | 正版全新電子版PDF檔 | 您已选择: | 正版全新 | 溫馨提示:如果有多種選項,請先選擇再點擊加入購物車。*. 電子圖書價格是0.69折,例如了得網價格是100元,電子書pdf的價格則是69元。 *. 購買電子書不支持貨到付款,購買時選擇atm或者超商、PayPal付款。付款後1-24小時內通過郵件傳輸給您。 *. 如果收到的電子書不滿意,可以聯絡我們退款。謝謝。 | | | | 內容介紹 | |
-
出版社:五洲傳播
-
ISBN:9787508529592
-
作者:疏震婭//張海文|譯者:魏怡
-
頁數:172
-
出版日期:2014-11-01
-
印刷日期:2014-11-01
-
包裝:平裝
-
開本:32開
-
版次:1
-
印次:1
-
字數:65千字
-
釣魚島及其附屬島嶼是中國領土不可分割的一部分。無論從歷史還是法理的角度來看,釣魚島都是中國的固有領土,中國對其擁有無可爭辯的主權。日本在1895年利用甲午戰爭竊取釣魚島是非法的、無效的。第二次世界大戰後,根據《開羅宣言》和《波茨坦公告》等**法律文件,釣魚島回歸中國。美國在20世紀50年代擅自將釣魚島納入其“托管”範圍,後在70年代以歸還“托管”領土為名與日本私相授受釣魚島,都沒有也不能改變釣魚島屬於中國的事實。 疏震婭、張海文、魏怡主編的《釣魚島(英文版)》一書全面詳實、有理有據地說明了釣魚島是中國的固有領土,揭示了日本企圖侵占中國釣魚島的非法行徑,可以幫助**社會*客觀地認識釣魚島的問題,向社會大眾揭示釣魚島歸屬的真相。書稿內容**,對讀者認識和了解釣魚島問題,具有**大的幫助。
-
疏震婭、張海文、魏怡主編的《釣魚島(英文版
)》主要內容包括認識釣魚島、釣魚島的價值、釣魚
島為什麼屬於中國、日本如何竊取釣魚島、二戰後釣
魚島理應歸還中國、美國“托管”埋下禍根、“擱置
爭議”的默契共識、誰在“改變現狀”以及中國維護
釣魚島主權的努力九個方面。通過對這些問題的闡述
,力圖全方位地介紹釣魚島問題,以期說明釣魚島屬
於中國的歷史事實和法理依據,批判日本的無理主張
和非法挑釁,向社會大眾揭示事實真相,以正視聽。
-
Knowing Diaoyu Dao The Values of Diaovu Dao Territorial Sovereignty and Maritime Rights and Interests Natural Resources Security and Strategic Values Political Values Why Does Diaoyu Dao Belong to China? Diaoyu Dao was First Discovered, Named and Exploited by China Diaoyu Dao Had Long Been under China's Jurisdiction Chinese and Foreign Maps Show that Diaoyu Dao Belongs to China How Did Japan Grab Diaoyu Dao from China? Japan's Long-term Covert Moves to Seize Diaoyu Dao Japan's Secret Incorporation of Diaoyu Dao into Its Territory Diaoyu Dao was Ceded to Japan together with the Taiwan Island Transfer of Real Property Right after Japan's Occupation of Diaoyu Dao Japan Should Return Diaoyu Dao to China After WWll Stipulations in Cairo Declaration: All the Territories Japan has Stolen from the Chinese Shall be Restored to China Potsdam Proclamation: Limiting Japanese Sovereignty Japan's Surrender Documents Admitting its International Obligations Root of the Trouble: U.S.'s "Administration" Diaoyu Dao Never Belongs to the Ryukyu Islands The United States Illegally Included Diaoyu Dao under Its "Trusteeship" of the Ryukyu Archipelago The United States and Japan Conducted Backroom Deals Concerning the "Power of Administration" over Diaoyu Dao Changes of the U.S. Positions Acquiescence in Shelving Differences China and Japan Regarded the Overall Situation of Reestablishing Diplomatic Relations and Agreed to "Shelve This Issue for the Time Being and Wait for Other Opportunities to Discuss It" The Acquiescence in Shelving Differences Formed during the Diplomatic Normalization of the Sino-Japanese Relations China's Proposal of Shelving Differences and Seeking Joint Development Japan's Control of Right-wingers Demonstrates that It Acknowledges That There is A Territorial Dispute over the Diaoyu Dao Who Is Changing the Status Quo? The So-called "Power of Administration" Officially Supported Civil Activities Strictly "Coordinated Control" of Military Police Thorough Military Deployment of Island Retaking China's Efforts to Uphold Its Sovereignty over Diaoyu Dao Forceful Countermeasures of Chinese Government. Unremitting Endeavors of China's Civil Activists China's Steadfast Resolve to Defend Its Sovereignty Epilogue: Facing History Squarely and Building the Future Postscript Bibliograph
| | | | | |